Universal Translator

Showing posts with label Pilgrims. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pilgrims. Show all posts

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Yankee Humbuggery

Well, this is interesting.

A few days ago I posted a rant about Fox News’ trumped up “War on Christmas.”  One of the things I ranted about was the fact that somehow in America we’ve become indoctrinated with a childlike understanding of our own nation’s early history that consists of nothing but three steps:  Pilgrims, Revolution, America.  I’ve always wondered why it is the history of New England plays such a large role in our collective psyche, whereas the much more interesting history of, say, Jamestown, is generally forgotten.

(Did you know that during that colony’s first horrific winter people dug up graves and ate their dead family members to survive?  I’m telling you, if I had been taught that story in elementary school I definitely would have found America’s early history a lot more interesting.)

Well, I’m finishing up Colin Woodard’s American Nations, and I’ve gotten to the bit where he is discussing the waves of immigration that swept the United States in the 1800s and into the early 21st 20th century.  According to Woodard, the people who originally colonized what came to be New England and who later spread throughout the upper midwest (he refers to this area, collectively, as “Yankeedom”) were always concerned with maintaining a strong sense of shared identity and conformity.

Accordingly, when large numbers of people began immigrating to America, Yankees worked diligently to assimilate these new people into Yankee culture:

The notion of America having been a “melting pot” in which immigrants were transmuted into “Anglo-Protestant Americans” really refers to a Yankee remedy intimately tied to the folkways of a covenanted, utopia-building people who were themselves almost entirely English in origin. . . .   [H]istorians at Harvard, Yale and other Yankee institutions were crafting a mythic “national” history for students to celebrate, which emphasized the centrality of the (previously neglected) Pilgrim voyage, the Boston Tea Party, and Yankee figures such as the minutemen, Paul Revere, and Johnny Appleseed.  (The Puritans were recast as champions of religious freedom, which would have surprised them, while Jamestown, New Amsterdam, and the early Anglican settlements of Maine were ignored.)

(emphasis added)

Huh.  So the only reason we all now share this “national” heritage, focused on the “previously neglected” (I love that) Pilgrims, recasting them in the unlikely role of “champions of religious freedom” is because a bunch of damned Yankees made it up.  It was public relations, it was marketing, it was sheerest humbuggery.

I cannot begin to tell you how much it delights me to learn this.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

A Conscientious Objector in the War on Christmas

During The Daily Show’s first segment last night, Jon Stewart went after Fox News for again turning the Holiday Season into a trumped up culture clash that Fox insists on describing as “The War on Christmas.”  Once again, blogger doesn’t seem to be able to embed video from The Daily Show but you can watch it here.  (It really is very funny.)

As always, right-wingers’ complaints about their so-called ‘War on Christmas’ devolve to an assertion that “America is Christian nation” and – when called upon to defend this patently untrue statement – they point to the Pilgrims, who settled in New England seeking ‘religious freedom.’ 

(For the record, Americans may be a Christian people – by and large – but that does not make us a Christian nation.  The First Amendment makes clear that the government is to neither establish a religion nor to interfere with its citizens’ religious observances.  Our governing document, in other words, is religion neutral.  Of course, being ‘neutral toward’ religion is not the same as being ‘hostile toward’ religion.)

But hearing this sort of stuff always sticks in my craw, because it is very, very stupid.  I can never help but think that the people who make this argument betray that they never acquired more than a Fourth Grade education of American history, and that they should by all rights be embarrassed by their own ignorance.  So let me get just a few things off of my chest: